#1 Imprecise Project Planning
While best practices exist for project management, every project manager knows that real-world scenarios often require deviation from the textbook. Adopting an innovative, dynamic approach, such as agile project management, can be more effective than traditional, standardised methods. Combining different methodologies can also contribute to a customised project control approach. However, inaccurate assumptions during the planning phase are the biggest obstacles. Comprehensive project planning is time-consuming and costly, but it is essential for the successful execution of a construction project. Relying on rough estimates and vague assumptions during initial planning fails to provide a solid foundation for subsequent steps.
#2 Unrealistic Expectations
Imprecise and unconsidered factors within the project team quickly lead to tensions. This often triggers a chain reaction: initial issues in project execution go unreported in the hope that delays or budget overruns can be compensated for later. This pressure is passed down to project staff, who must continuously adapt their work to changing conditions. Consequently, planning accuracy decreases as the project progresses. Instead of a realistic project assessment, teams adhere to initial targets that were never valid, reducing reliability over time.
#3 Lack of Transparency in Collaboration
The complexity of construction projects should not be underestimated. Traditional project management tools struggle to clearly and in real-time represent the networks between contracting partners and interdependent project steps. Negative snowball effects can only be avoided if dependencies within a project’s value chain are accurately contextualised and always visible. Multi-layered Excel sheets, isolated solutions, and unstructured data hinder necessary information transparency and process agility. Digital solutions can map all project levels comprehensively by linking stakeholders, data, and workflows.
#4 Ineffective De-escalation Measures
Lack of oversight, inadequate project planning, and resulting obstacles necessitate de-escalation measures. Reorienting the project team is a critical juncture. Appointing new project managers or changing key subcontractors admits project difficulties, increasing pressure on all involved. Bringing in external experts requires them to understand current project structures, causing further delays and costs. If new leaders aim to make substantial structural changes, they return to Phase One: detailed and meaningful project planning. Often, there is no time for a complete restart, so flawed Phase 2.0 planning continues. This does not eliminate issues but merely postpones them, leading to recurring risks and delays.
#5 Insufficient Knowledge Transfer
No two projects are alike: experienced project managers can abstract requirements from previous projects to new ones, but their planning remains rooted in assumptions and estimates. Risks, especially in pioneering projects, cannot be ruled out. Therefore, it is crucial to not only collect information from completed projects but also contextualise it. Data-based insights and comprehensive reports generate fundamental knowledge for future projects. Identifying problem areas, risk factors, and obstacles earlier allows for better prevention and resolution in subsequent projects.
Digital Networking: The Foundation for Successful Project Implementation
Every construction project involves a unique network of stakeholders. Beyond the ongoing challenge of team collaboration, structural conditions such as unforeseen risks and imprecise planning mainly hinder successful project execution. Alasco, an innovative web-based solution that consolidates all project information in one place, provides the necessary transparency on project status and serves as a data foundation for future projects. The complexity of project planning, which traditional tools cannot manage, is reduced through the digital networking of all project stakeholders enabled by Alasco.
