There are many investment opportunities but limited financial resources demand an efficient allocation. So, asset managers must assess which ESG measures offer the best cost-benefit ratio. This means: maximising CO2 savings and market value for the lowest possible costs.
Challenges in analysing and prioritising ESG measures
To decide which ESG measures to invest in, asset managers compare them according to various factors such as expected market value, CO2 savings and execution costs. But subsidies and possible increases in rent are also essential for the prioritisation. However, this data is hard to come-by as subsidies and potential rent hikes vary by region, building purpose and building location.
Some asset managers spend lots of time building their own simplified calculation models. This requires complex cost-benefit calculations to determine economic profitability and sustainability savings. So, asset managers need a deep understanding of the relationships between variables. But often, the necessary expertise for these calculations is missing.
As already mentioned, time and in-depth knowledge are necessary. Rarely are these resources available in-house. So, many outsource the evaluation of such measures to external parties. This, in turn, means high costs and dependencies.
To sum up, a simple and scalable way to compare ESG measures by costs and benefits internally is missing.
Faster analysis, easier comparison, ROI-based decision-making
The new ESG-Optimiser Plus by Alasco enables you to assess ESG measures quickly and easily. With it, you can compare measures by the costs incurred, the CO2 savings and resulting change in value. You can find out which subsidies are available for your measures. And calculate the payback period, the sustainable and economic profitability of your investment.
Use the ESG-Optimiser Plus to make economically and ecologically profitable investment decisions. Because this is the only way to ensure the sustainable success of your portfolio.
Smart ESG investments with Alasco at a glance:
- Independent cost-benefit evaluation of ESG measures
- Transparent comparison of ESG measures based on your Return-on-Investment
- Sound investment decisions by means of a few data points on the properties in question
- Consideration of regional and national subsidies
.jpg)